Management Committee Meeting 50 Minutes

WATERWAYS MANAGEMENT COMPANY
MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING NO 50
7.30 pm, Monday 12 May 2014
Present: Nicholas Orme (Chair), Adrian Olsen, Imogen Olsen, Mary Tovey, Tao Tao
Chou and Ann Hall.
In attendance: Rebecca Hill
Minute taker: Emma Thompson

  1. Apologies
    1.2 Apologies were received from Louise Robertson, Sally Duncan, Paula Reynolds,
    Lynda Williams and Adrian Mourby. It was noted that a second potential new
    member had expressed a desire to observe the meeting in July before making a
    decision about whether to be co-opted until the next AGM.
    A Chair was appointed to the meeting. The number present did not represent the
    minimum number required to formally hold a meeting. It was agreed that any
    recommendations would be noted and circulated to members for approval at the
    following meeting.
    1.3 The directors wanted to express their gratitude to an outgoing member who had
    worked hard to pass on their experience and best practice which would make the
    transition for the remaining directors much smoother.
  2. Private Business
    2.1 None.
  3. Minutes
    Approval of the minutes from meeting 49 (10/03/14)
    3.1 No amendments to the minutes were identified, which would be formally ratified at
    the next meeting.
  4. Appointment of responsibilities for 2014-15
    4.1 The matrix of directors’ responsibilities which had been circulated prior to the meeting
    was discussed. It was identified that new lead directors needed to be appointed to
    the Gardening Sub Committee and the Scrutiny Committee. One director volunteered
    to support the current lead for the Gardening Sub Committee but it was generally
    accepted that the current lead member had valuable knowledge relating to the
    watercourse issues and land ownership which would be invaluable but it was
    accepted that their duties would need to be reduced. By providing this additional
    2
    support and allowing them to stand down from the Scrutiny Committee it was hoped
    that they would be prepared to continue with these reduced commitments. In the
    event that this was still deemed to be too much, further discussion would need to
    take place outside of the meeting between several directors who might be prepared
    to change their respective roles to accommodate the requirement for the current
    Gardening Sub-Committee lead to reduce their overall commitments.
    4.2 It was noted that the current Chairman of the WMC had confirmed prior to the
    meeting that they would be prepared to stand for a further term of 12 months.
    4.3 Another director confirmed that they would be prepared to take on the role of lead
    director for the Scrutiny Committee.
    4.4 The Treasurer confirmed that they would be willing to continue in this role and would
    consult widely with colleagues which would remove the need to appoint a Deputy
    Treasurer, although the option would remain in the future, should it be necessary.
    4.5 A new secretary was proposed who would contact one of the out-going directors for
    handover notes in respect of the role and access to the Company portal.
    4.6 An error was highlighted on the paperwork in respect of changes which had been
    agreed the previous year which had not been reflected – namely the removal of one
    director from the Scrutiny Committee and details on the contacts directory which still
    indicated that certain information could be made public when it should not.
    4.7 A request was made for a second link between the WMC and the WRACIC. It was
    suggested that there was a useful alignment between the work of the WRACIC and
    the activities which were reported within the Waterways World. The current assistant
    editor of the Waterways World would be a natural fit. It was confirmed that the
    WRACIC met on the first Tuesday of every month but that attendance would not be
    necessary at every meeting. The same director volunteered to provide continuity by
    responding to feedback correspondence.
    4.8 The matrix would be circulated for comment by absent members and re-presented to
    the next meeting for approval.
  5. Setting of objectives
    5.1 It was identified that the two main objectives set for 2012-13 remained relevant for
    2014-15, these being:
    To produce a plan of action to resolve maintenance issues relating to the Frenchay
    Road culvert and the wildlife corridor watercourse (GSC)
    To secure the transfer of the freehold land of the Waterways development from
    Berkeley Homes to the WMC
    5.2 It was suggested that further consideration should be given to reviewing the
    performance/ retendering the managing agent this year.
    3
    5.3 That the three objectives for 2014-15 be presented at the next meeting for approval.
  6. Annual General Meeting (AGM)
    6.1 The draft minutes from the AGM held on 29th April 2014 were tabled at the meeting.
    A number of amendments were highlighted. One director had come to the end of
    their second year of office and had not been elected following co-option, item 7
    should be re-worded to state: “had submitted their resignation as Directors” and a set
    of parenthesis was missing from item 9.2.
    6.2 Subject to these amended minutes being approved at the next WMC meeting, the
    draft minutes should be uploaded on to the Waterways website and that the
    approved final minutes of the minutes from the AMG held on 23rd April 2013 should
    be published on the website.
  7. Matters arising from the minutes from meeting 49
    7.1 It was noted that following further investigation the provision of a power supply from
    the bin store would be impractical as it would only be available at night. The Council
    had agreed to yellow lines at the Bainton Road/Elizabeth Jennings Way cycle path
    link and Green Square had proposed employing somebody to visit its tenants to ask
    them to respect the use of the Clearwater Place bin store.
    7.2 It was noted that the managing agents were proposing to ask the cleaners to ensure
    that the refuse area within Clearwater Place was tidy each week. This additional cost
    would be allocated to Schedule 7 which would result in both private and Green
    Square tenants contributing to this cost.
    7.3 It was reported that even Kids Unlimited suspected that residents had begun using its
    refuse facilities to dispose of residential waste.
    7.4 A discussion ensued on whether the Council would accept plastic bags within
    apartment recycling containers. A director proposed to seek clarification on the
    Council’s policy.
  8. Health and Safety
    8.1 It was noted that no response to the correspondence issued by the managing agent
    on behalf of the WMC had been received from the resident who had enquired
    whether it would be possible to including lighting along the wildlife corridor.
    . Sub Committee news round up
    9.1 Finance Sub-Committee
    9.1.1 It was noted that the premium for the indemnity insurance had remained static for the
    last two years and that it was likely to be around £410. The managing agent
    confirmed that as soon as they received notification of the renewal that they would
    forward it on to the Treasurer.
    4
    9.1.2 Having reviewed the legal position regarding the transfer ownership and Schedule 3
    charges relating to a property on Stone Meadow, the managing agent confirmed that
    the details of the transfer did not allow for the WMC to charge for parking
    maintenance.
    9.2 Apartment Block Sub-Committee
    9.2.1 It was reported that the lift pit within apartment block 56-90 Elizabeth Jennings was
    full of water and had been out of order for seven weeks as a result. This was having
    a serious impact on a number of residents who were suffering from severe asthma. It
    was noted that Kone had to be in attendance to open the lift pit but that they had
    been refusing to remove the water on the basis that it was contaminated with oil. The
    managing agent had arranged for contractors to be on standby with a variety of
    methods to remove the water (buckets, pumps etc). The lift operator was proving less
    than co-operative in resolving the situation which was made even more frustrating as
    they had recently had their contract renewed. This type of service was not what the
    WMC had grown to expect. Future lapses in service would not be tolerated.
    9.3 Gardening Sub-Committee
    9.3.1 It was noted that no news had been received from the Tree Officer in respect of the
    application which had been made to reduce the stature of the Poplar tree by between
    30% and 50% to make it safe following its partial reduction by the Canal and River
    Trust. No information had been provided on the progress of any enforcement action
    which the Council might wish to take against the Canal and River Trust.
    .
    9.3.2 It was reported that a coded gate lock would be installed this week for the electricity
    sub-station access way.
    9.3.3 A report from Metro Rod on the watercourse was received. Directors were concerned
    that the organisation had not undertaken what they had been asked. As a result, the
    managing agent had withheld payment. In fact, it was noted that Metro Rod had
    refused to put a camera down the siphon to check whether it was operating correctly.
    This evidence was vital to determine the potential site of the blockage within the
    entire watercourse in order to develop a solution.
    9.3.4 It was noted that Thames Water had come to site three days after a formal complaint
    had been made to the Consumer Council. The company had claimed that the siphon
    was clear and that they had now complied with their obligations.
    9.3.5 Several directors volunteered to meet with Metro Rod to talk them through exactly
    what was required to avoid any future confusion.
    9.3.6 The discussion reminded the Treasurer that they needed to confirm with the
    Oxfordshire Conservation Volunteers the date for this year’s wildlife corridor
    clearance weekend.
    5
    9.4. Feedback
    9.4.1 It was noted that a request had been made for a copy of the Memorandum of
    Understanding which would be duly actioned.
  9. Matters arising from the question and answer session at the AGM, 29th April
    2014
    10.1 The questions were noted and it was reported that whilst the coffee morning had
    been less than successful two clubs had been established in the community room –
    creative writing and meditation.
    10.2 It was noted that the managing agent had replied to a resident who had enquired
    whether any other residents within the development had experienced problems with
    door handles failing, confirming that this had been the case.
    10.3 The managing agents confirmed that following approval of the guidelines on
    proposals for development of properties within the Waterways at the AGM, it would
    circulate the final version to freeholder owners.
  10. WRACIC
    11.1 Nothing additional to report.
  11. Managing Agent
    12.1 Nothing to report.
  12. Any other business
    13.1 It was proposed that an evening dinner should be arranged in June at the Anchor for
    departing, current and newly appointed directors.
  13. Date of next meetings
    The meetings for the year ahead were noted as follows:
    14th July 2014
    8
    th September 2014 (provisional, subject to confirmation by absent members)